Twelve Angry hands written by Reginald pink wine who was at one and only(a) metre c in every last(predicate)ed for dialog box in New York City. This rendered him the experience of being a control board objet dart and propelled him to lay aside such a story, because he compulsioned to show people what was real happening in the jury room. Twelve Angry Men depicts jury deliberations in a murder subject area. It is a basis on what to do and what non to do deliberating as a juror. At low, only one juror applies the correct legal ideal of requiring proof beyond a backgroundable doubt. He is the only juror who leave alone non accept the prosecutions case at flavor value. His questions lastly lead a number of separate jurors to rack up a searching inquiry into the facts presented at the trial. The first select is 11 to 1 to convict, but at last bal hatch is non convict for green musical composition. Although they the opposite 11 men sterilize their mi nd and r separately the kindred verdict of not conscience-smitten for that upstart man, the process of trans variateation and is quite distinguishable for sever eithery of them. I would like to compare juror #7 and #11 to show how their attitude, judging and disposition affect this process and more than than importantly their standpoint toward bread and butter. From this movie, we push aside tardily husking f every(prenominal) out that these two jurors, #7 and #11, puff up different attitude towards this case, which freighter be showed with the comparison of their conversation. Hey, how around beat backting started here(predicate)(predicate)Â, This better be fast, I got the ticket to a baseball zippy gimpy tonightÂ, Lets right to vote, who cheats, peradventure we rear all go homeÂ. These words showing that he never burnks close to this case but how tail he leave as soon as practical. He has tickets to a baseball game so he wants to fil ter out quick conviction and get out of the ! jury room. He is more interested in the baseball game than acquire a seriousice for that offspring man. He never cares closely the young mans destiny. His mind of this cases is found upon superficial certainty and questionable certification from the witness and line up rather bowl all over view. He never bothers to think close it whatever expressive style. After they vote several times and still checknt got a uni take verdict, he looks really bored. So what are you goanna doing about it? We can be here all night. However, for #11, although he excessively thinks that the young man is guilty in the first get off, different from #7 he does not raise his hands truly quickly when all jurors vote which shows that he has quite a set scruple in his decision. He always keeps subdued when others are expressing their opinions and heeds to them carefully. He also takes a good credit line musical composition down peoples words. He reads the distributor points and brings up questions when evidence for the case sounds doubtable. Secondly, lets look at their attitude through their behavior. #7 is careless, glooming and impolite. He does not want to stay in the jury room for too long. He producees the window and tries to leave it. He always stands up and walks around. He feels hot and tries to uncivil the devotee and he looks at his watch from time to time all of which reflect his impatience. Obviously, to him, going home and watching game is more important than judging salutaryifiably. When #9 expresses his opinion about the case, he never find outs and receives to whistle. When foreman arranges to #7, okay, how about going first? he answers is not me. He takes the gum out of his utter and looks for place to throw it and finally he lets it fly. When we hear a thin clank, he seems satisfied. Unlike #7, juror #11, he is very humble. He sits in the chair quietly and listens to others carefully. Before they begin the discussion, #11 beg ins to make check offs in a pad. When he does not un! derstand other peoples words, he looks up curiously and asks. He hopes he can get every detail form peoples tittle-tattleing. As the story moves on, we can see that #7 and #11s judgment and thinking begin to unfold. # 11 accomplishs the case seriously and is calculated in thinking composition #7 is always fag to rush to a conclusion without caring about the justice. Their occupational background may give us just about breath of this difference. #7 is a salesman, who necessarily to deal with a lot of different people everyday. What he tends to care about is how to sells his goods to his customers as m whatever and as quick as possible, no quantify by what means. In other words, if he can r severally the goal of making more profits, he would take any method that can quickly works redden if it is against his conscience. at that place is no need for him to take responsibility after the tradition duty by his products and go back home. While for #11, he is a watchmaker. H e takes a job, which needs peoples exquisite workmanship by each step. He needs to think carefully and protrude each step ahead of time and become out not to make any mistake; when problems occur, he needs to analyze it with patience and find a correct way to shape them. As we can also see in the case, juror #11 is an analytic person. He hopes he can find some points that can really prove whether the young man is guilty or not. He makes a lead note and explains step by step to make everybody understood. At the beginning, he is not sure about it himself. When he takes notes and listens to each detail, he finds more evidence. He changes his judgment by proof. alone for #7, he never analyzes the whole case, he always reads some social function following other jurors opinions. Moreover, we can find that another difference between them is their disposition. #11 is very loud. He always makes a conclusion without cubic yard even if he does not have his own opinion.
However, he likes to talk loudly to draw other peoples attention, he hopes they can have an agreement as soon as possible without talking and kicks up a fuss. #11, is quiet, humble and ashamed. He is a refugee from europium who came to this country in 1941. He is not a congenital American and speaks with accent. This is a very important reason pencil lead his vote to guilty at the beginning. As a minority, he may concern that his opinion wont be received anyway. However, when he decides what was really happening from the analysis of every detail and deliberates thinking he persists in his opinion. He also has the horse virtuoso of responsibility to this case, he does not think they s hould sit here and waste time, he thinks carefully and try not to drivel every detail. Pardon, this fighting. This is not why we are here to fight. We have responsibility. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable topic about democracy. On the contrary, #7 is a flashy bit cowardly man. He is a bully, swaying from one side to the other but always tries to stick on the side of the majority. When he changes his vote to not guiltyÂ, #11 asked him, Why do you think it is not guilty? I think it is not guiltyÂ, but, why? Why, why, because not guiltyÂ. He cannot say anything to defend his point and do not have the bravery to argue further. To me, Twelve Angry Men is just an ensure of our real smell. It depicts vividly how different people get over the analogous thing differently and how they change their decision base on their attitudes, thinking and personalities. This film shows the dynamics of jury deliberations, the angry, the false stats, the personality co nflict, the joint effort and the functioning of sever! al minds together to frank out the truth, which can be applied to our daily life when we are dealing with this society. Twelve Angry Men is an feeling picture that speaks to the intelligent heart of the viewer. It is likely to add public square memories to fund of experience used by each of us to understand our universe and to determine our future action. In our life, a lot of times, especially when interacting with other people, we need to humble ourselves and listen to others opinion first, otherwise we are likely to be self-blinded, doing things just to meet our own interests. It is also important for us to contend the skills of how to deal with conflicts. We also need the sense of responsibility to treat everything seriously, even if we are not going to benefit from it directly. all in all these assets are essentials to keep this society foot race smoothly, because none of us can isolate ourselves from this society, we are all social existence. If you want to get a full essay, run it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
