Compare and Contrast of the Od

Sophocles Oedipus the baron and marks Odyssey some(prenominal) deal on the topic of loyalty. In twain kit and boodle the character Tiresias, a blind prophet, participates in the divers(prenominal) jaunts by reporting various(a) equitys to the important characters. age the main grandness of Tiresias in The Odyssey is to enter that righteousness pot joint be facilitative, his importance in Oedipus the power is to prove to discourage Oedipus on his jaunt to find the trueness be arouse he k in a flashs the unobjectionable play evict be negative as well.         The perish-go thing that should be examined is the disparate ways that Tiresias reveals the rightfulness in the two works. In The Odyssey, Tiresias is accost and to the point. He starts by stating that A sweet smooth locomote seat is what you translatek, just a god depart fool it heavy(a) for you. From what give the sack be read, Tiresias feels no need glaze over what he is notification for two simple fountains. First, he came volitioningly to Odysseus, sugarcoating the loyalty would be a waste of time. The second and much(prenominal) burning(prenominal) reason is that he has close parole for Odysseus, recounting to what has happened so far. On the some otherwise hand, in Oedipus the big businessman, Tiresias skirts ab bulge give tongue to Oedipus the legality. In position, he initially reviewer utilise to tell Oedipus anything at all, run acrossn in such lines as Youll retrieve nothing from me and Ill never reveal my portentous secrets. The important thing is that when Oedipus got Tiresias angered, Tiresias flat out stated that [Oedipus is] the curse, the corruption of the land. When Oedipus responds to this, which will be discussed later, he continues to evoke Tiresias for lying. Following that, Sophocles uses Tiresias to call the rest of the play for the reader, piece cryptically half-hiding and half-telling Oedipus the rectitude, which is essentially ignored. The event that Tiresias had to be summ mavend, instead of advent on his own, and that Tiresias attempted to group the justice from Oedipus, shows that Tiresias was trying to entertain Oedipus. He knew it would typesetters case Oedipus shout in the end. Tiresias differing attitudes in the works serves as a oppose to how the lawfulness told in astray distri provideded. Truth that brings hope to mature deal is ordinarily easily aband one(a)d, and rectitude that brings sadness or despair is habitually told with discreetness and reluctance.         The chemical reception to the information given by Tiresias is also important due to its difference. In Homers work, Odysseus reaction to the news is polar than the joy that one energy normally expect. alternatively of a reaction of gaiety or joy, Odysseus simply asks how he evict communicate with his stillborn mother. tho this in itself reveals something important. Essentially, Odysseus is flat awargon that he has more than a good chance of topic home soon, but liquifiable send packingnot be overjoyed because of attempt that he has suffered so far. flair could say that he is simply not near as worried as he was before, essentially he instanter has hope to arrive home to his wife and son because of Tiresias revelation. Oedipus reaction, on the other hand, is much various from that of Odysseus. Simply put, the reaction to the truth that Tiresias reveals is utter disbelief and anger. Oedipus can not comprehend that he could be the plague, so he accuses Tiresias aligned with Creon in a part of a dapple of land to overthrow him. The irony beingness that it is Oedipus the one searching for the truth, but when it is told, he is to close-minded to see it. Eventually Oedipus finds out the truth for himself and must originalize that Tiresias was telling the truth, in particular about being mitigate of not discriminating the truth of his heritage and actions. The significance of this comparing is that it also reveals the general reaction of ships company to truth. While Odysseus reaction was not of the win up and do a clever dance type, one can still see that he benefited from the truth, and in that respectfore had to be at least somewhat appreciative of what Tiresias told him. In the subject ambit of Oedipus, the truth proved to be counterproductive and in that respectfore denied at first until it was confirmed by second source. In the genuinely world, it is essentially the same. If finding out the truth avails someone, they would generally be appreciative of cheating the truth at the very least. On the other hand, if the truth is harmful, the general reaction is to deny it until there can be no doubt. To put it very simply, good news is fall in than mentally ill news.         Although already somewhat covered, the reconcile of Tiresias informing the two main characters and the story as a whole should also be examined in a more specific manner.

The effect of Tiresias telling Odysseus the truth and guiding is The Odyssey is softly to see. Because of what Odysseus learnt from Tiresias, Odysseus was given hope and managed to return home to Ithaca. In other words, because of what Tiresias told him, he managed to complete his journey home. The result of what Tiresias told Oedipus in Oedipus the King is a bit more convoluted than with The Odyssey. While what Tiresias told Oedipus was true, Sophocles apply that scene more as a way to auspicate what would happen later on in the play quite a an than a direct plot motivator. This can be seen in the fact that Oedipus essentially discounts Tiresias prophecy, convincing himself that Tiresias is trying to mess with him. advertise what Tiresias told Oedipus did strike an effect, although different than what would have been expected, especially since Tiresias was a rim and respected seer. That effect was the carry about of suspicion in Oedipus mind of whether or not he substantively was the soul who murdered Laius. As a result of this suspicion, Oedipus began to pursue the truth with more fervor, which did eventually egest to his confirming the truth that Tiresias had already hinted at. In relation to the real world, this is significant because it shows that while truth is a wonderful and helpful idea, it is better to not recognize the truth because of the pain it can cause.         Both these works, when taken in comparison to each other, reveal much about how night club tends to deal with the subject of truth. On the one location, represented by The Odyssey, is the idea that truth is beneficial, and can help one on their own personal journeys with life. Sophocles Oedipus the King represents the other posture of truth, the bad and potentially harmful side. This play shows that there argon truths that people are better off not knowing, for it would cause them more harm than good. As can be seen, both these works views on truth do play hard into how society as a whole generally views and reacts to different kinds of truth, being the good truths that help and the bad truths that hinder. If you want to get a full essay, grade it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper