Although the new(a) England and Chesapeake offices came from similar backgrounds, the way they developed created two real different societies. The land, the people, faith and government all played critical roles in the shaping of these two regions.
A major distinction in the two regions is who actually came and settled in the respective(prenominal) beas. new-made England attracted families, making this region family oriented, thus it was safer. Health was break down because people looked after their families and protected them. People were less unforced to do things that could be potentially dangerous because they wanted to be around to help their families.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, the Chesapeake region was mainly settled by young, single, men, who?s main refinement was to make m sensationy. They didn?t have families to watch after, and no one was watching after them. Dangerous tasks were undertaken more willingly because no one would be greatly affected should something go wrong. Because of this difference, New England had a lower death rate therefore it?s population grew faster than that of Chesapeake.
Faith also was a decision making factor in how each region was developed. Religious freedom was the very reason that the Puritans (who settled in New England) came to the New World.
Not only was this a uniting force throughout the region, but it made them, as John Winthrop said, ?As a city upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us... We shall open the mouths of our enemies to speak evil of the ways of God?(Document A.) In other words, the colonists were determine to succeed and be model Christians while they were at it, because the entire world was watching them. If they were to fail in their colony, they thought that the world would blame God for it.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment