Euthanasia Essay - Let Them Die! :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide

Euthanasia - Let Them Die Euthanasia is oneness of societys most widely and hotly debated moral issues. Ithas pained and exhausted the courts for only when too long, questioning the moral philosophy and morality of the issue. It is a never-ending spiral that by no meansconsiders our right, or the victims right, to freedom. It has pierced thepocket books of American taxpayers extensively and should be put to rest withonly this statement. Let them choke off I believe that mercy killing is only debated and kept on the semipolitical agenda tokeep the courts busy, thereby ensuring the security of political pocket books.The commodious majority of the population is in favor of euthanasia. However, theirelected candidates dont represent their views (Humphry). olibanum eliminatingtheir power of democracy and right to freedom. In this essay I pull up stakes argue thateuthanasia is not a concern of religious ethics but sooner an entitlement offreedom. Euthanasia is typically broken int o two categories 1. combat-ready euthanasia The act of ...administering a lethal drug, or using separatemeans that cause a persons death (MacKinnon, 126). 2. static euthanasia fish fillet (or not starting) some treatment, which allows aperson to die, the persons condition causes his or her death, (MacKinnon, 126). officious euthanasia is typically the more highly debated of the two acts ofeuthanasia and is discover known because of the actions of Dr. Jack Kevorkian, whohas aided in many successful suicides. Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, is rarely debated and usually neverenters the minds eye because it is typically looked at as letting someone dienaturally. In inactive euthanasia one simply refuses treatment with theknowledge that death is imminent. This offers undersized debate for severalreasons, primarily because it is seen as a natural office of dying. The exception,however, is that some religions refuse to accept treatment with the knowledgethat without the tr eatment they provide die. For example in the faith of theJehovahs Witness, a child, who has been in a nefarious car accident and is inneed of blood, will die rather that accept treatment. This kind of passiveeuthanasia would come under often scrutiny, but be accepted because it is tied toreligious convictions. In either case, active or passive, the victim will die. There is essentially nodifference between them. From herein both active and passive euthanasia will notbe separated but rather both will be referred to simply as euthanasia. It willbe the patriarchal interest of this paper to focus on and address the concerns of