Freedom Writers

FREEDOM WRITERS MOVIE REVIEW The movie license Writers (directed by Richard LaGravenese , starring Hilary Swank as Erin Gruwell an excited new teacher, Scott Glenn as Steve Gruwell (Erins father), Imelda Staunton as Marg art Vail ( subdivision head), Patrick Dempsey as Scott Casey (Erins husband), Mario as Andre (student), and April downwind Hernandez as Eva (Student)) gave me the impression of displace a hidden message. In that message it said a volume to me slightly how anyone no matter who they argon, have the right to do anything if they atomic number 18 willing to stand up for it.We watch as an up and advent teacher teaches a classroom of students who interpose and go to juvenile handle centers, homeless, and for some jail, to work to find oneselfher and not against. It has also been inspirational to me because it teaches raft not to discriminate or stereotype separates rightful(prenominal) because of their social background. isthmus in Long Beach, California (199 41996), Freedom Writers, based on a true story, puts into play this negative stereotype of quite a little within an ethnic community belonging to a crime filled environment.The high inculcate students within the movie belong to a segregated community, where each escape is divided into separate tribes. The students argon represented as a key luff to the movie, and the right smart they struggle to break free from the chaotic automatic teller around them to emerge as one, putting away the elements of the separate/ duplicate and accepting their classmates for who they are rather than the color of their skin or ethnicity. On her first day teaching, Erin Gruwell encounters an empty classroom and has to wait till a school officer drags the students into class.The students separate into racial groups in the classroom, fights break out, and in conclusion most of the high school students stop attending class. Not just does Gruwell feel hostility from her high school students, alone she also clashes with her department head, who refuses to let her teach her high school students with countersigns in case they get damaged and lost, and instead tells her to focus on training them discipline and obedience.As cartridge holder passes on she slowly scarcely eventu every(prenominal)(prenominal)y begins to earn their trust and buys them committal to writing books to record their diaries, in which they talk some their experiences of being evicted, abused, and seeing their friends die. I believe Hilary Swank fulfilled her part as a teacher for her students because she made it seem as if she was re onlyy going above and beyond for the students. I believe Imelda Staunton who played as Margaret Vail, fulfilled the expectations but at the same era, I feel hers could have been more out on that point.April Lee Hernandez as Eva, was perfect for the role because she gave her character a hostile and knockout demeanor. I think that made her more exciting to listen to beca use of what she has come from to achieve her perception of others in the movie. I was excited by this movie and would watch it again for the characters backgrounds and seeing them achieve their goals. The actors gave what was asked of them.Freedom WritersThere is an straightforward discrimination shown in the movie Freedom Writers, where e genuinelybody hates everybody and they got no choice but to live in a humankind full of pandemonium. Random heathen implications are shown in the movie. Where one has to accept his/her society since birth, or someone has to really uniting a gang to keep up and belong to a hood. In the case of the students in the movie, they are just still if hopeless and what they all just do is to keep raging flames in their hearts. Until one tough and undeniably smart professor came on their way to take action Ms.Gruwell. As Ms. Gruwell came into the movie, I just thought that there will really be one person who will out of the blue cross ones life and lead you towards impunity. Same with the world or certain country where there is rampant chaos and a peacemaker leads to fight for the right. At first, Ms. Gruwell had dismay that she wasnt able to picture everything. And because she thinks and considers the factors she sees in her current endeavor, she came up with a very unique visualize that a usual professor wouldnt think about. FREEDOM WRITING. I guess, the maker of the movie wanted to disseminate how the therapy of writing ones feelings comes into such a relief to those whose minds are insane and broken. This is a very good twist in the movie, where in cultural liberalism takes place. Series of difficulties are shown in the movie, and how brave Ms. Gruwell and the students faced it together. Regardless of race, nationality and status, they all worked it out and disrespect Ms. Gruwells dispute in school, everything worked out the way it is supposed to be.I tangle bad because I know that the movie really happens in reality, and I have this hope in my heart that there will be more people who will understand and become more a equal Ms. Gruwell. The line Everyday I worry when will I be free. is poignant. Same as in our daily lives when we encounter suffering, we ask ourselves and feels like were being trapped. All we have to do is sigh, pray and blow over There we will find peace. We s abode be always open for changes for it is indispensible and constant. We shall all be brave and continue life as it is by chip for the truth.We shall always voice out our thoughts and prevent misjudges because of races and kinds. We must be get together despite the challenges in life. We shall not condemn one but ourselves also when society has its crisis and it breaks dow. And when WE break down, we shall stand UP one by one. The book Outliers? is basically are achievement stories wherein Malcolm Gladwell, a renowned writer, gives practicable explanations of how awful people gain success. The stories situated i n the book always have-to doe with different aspects of success such as the environment, diligence and hard work, coincidences and other things happening around.Basically, the mentations give common-sense? answer to the question. These people have succeeded because of the things that surrounds them and not just only by themselves. As stated It makes a difference where and when we grew up, this clearly explains that a person don? t achieve success not only by himself but it matters on the situations and opportunities that lies around him. Gladwell investigates place, succession and culture of these success stories in order to come up with practical explanations behind it.This also includes the relevant events that happened in certain period of term where these people are part and been to these events. So in other words, these people have been to certain event in their lives that made them succeed. Gladwell thought of these idea to see the logic about being successful or not, in this case is by asking where these people came from. One way Gladwell explains it is by determining the important events in certain period of time which are based on patterns of birthdates of a group of people such as the Canadian hockey police squad, Czechoslovakian National Junior Soccer team and the people behind today? technology, MAC and PC. There are many an(prenominal) different stories that Gladwell shared in order to produce one purview of defining success. And, this all comes to one conclusion what? s behind success. 10,000 arcminute Rule The 10,000 hour rule is my most favorite part of the book, where it explains patience and hard work. These are the most important things that I believe about success. Practically, we need practices in order to make things perfect and in order. It? s a universal idea of how things became successful with more practices you do to be closer to perfection and success.There are thousands of stories behind success that involves practicing an d perseverance. From the Outliers? , especially with the musicians in the stories, it will take a weed of practices and experiences to produce series of coarse performances. The Beatles Lennon and McCartney started playing in 1957 but became known in the U. S. in 1964, which they took 7 years to succeed. To compare it with other genre, Smashing Pumpkins started playing in 1988 in Chicago, Illinois they succeeded in the U. S. in 1992 and entered the international music industry in 1995.Charice Pempengco started to join singing contests at the age of 7, and joined hundreds of it before she performed in flair King in Korea at the age of 14 where Ellen DeGeneres discovered her in YouTube, and she started her international career with David Foster at the age of 15. Her success became unstoppable, but it took years of experiences in order to gain her continuous success. You behind in truth compare a lot of stories to 10,000 hour rule, this is very common to every success stories aro und the world. That? why this is the idea I believe and comprehended most. Decoded Numbers Gladwell presented many arguments regarding years, birth-dates, poesy and patterns. And basically, this numbers does show something and its about success. But what I am trying to figure out is if there are millions of numbers of combinations that can be presented by anyone and Gladwell truly showed only about 10 or 20 sets of numbers and dates in tables to exhibit this logic, and basically this can just occasional and coincidences in my opinion.I do actually believe in his investigations as presented in the book, but it was actually lofty and likely can be occurred in just some point in time. In other way, if we compare other set of numbers in the same procedure, these are just a few samples and would be good as basis for success. For example, the birth dates of Chicago Bulls in NBA during the time of Michael Jordan where they became phenomenal and very famous because of winning six champ ionships in 8 years during the 1990? s and they also won the finals over Utah love in 1998 which is the one of the most popular game in NBA.Below are the rosters for Chicago Bulls in 1997-1998. Technically, you cannot see any pattern except that all of them are born between 1961 to 1974 and above 90% went to college. And also the hall of famer trio, Jordan, Pippen and Rodman do not have anything in common with their birthdates and where they studied. Gladwell actually showed patterns in certain stories but there? s still a lot of success that does not have any methodological patterns. In my opinion, this can still be considered but not a good stead for success